-
ilovelamp51
- 5 stars Rating: 91
10142 votes total - Can't spell SWAG without the A.G.
- (19421)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ilovelamp51 said...
Nor do I... I can only go by off what he has said. Numerous times in recent weeks he has stated he is happy in Miami, wants to finish the job with the young guys he brought in & that his wife would cry (then kill him) if he took another job.
I trust a CFB coach about as far as I can throw him, but AG seems credible. FWIW I would like the Butch Jones hire.
UWBadgers27 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 63
182 votes total - (578)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CFLACane said...
Actually...
"During the month of December 2006, Saban was repeatedly questioned by the media about the Alabama job, and he repeatedly denied the rumors in his weekly press conferences, stating on December 21 "I guess I have to say it. I'm not going to be the Alabama coach."
Bolden1983 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
9772 votes total - (6819)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CFLACane said...
lol 15 schollys...pass what you're smoking...so far only proof NCAA has is some restaurant receipts from a convicted felon which cannot be verified and are past the statute of limitations. Considering they only supsened a handful of player for what amounted to less than 5k in benefits and they've resorted to threatening old players to testify they clearly are reaching. At very worst they slap us 10 and hope the former players or school doesnt sue them for defamation. (convicted felons testimony is a weak leg to stand on)
buckeye2280 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 74
2701 votes total - (1642)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Bolden1983 said...
Actually he did turn us down. 3 times actually until his wife said she wasnt happy. Then our AD got on a plane and had a face to face fully expecting another turn down. At no point did he ever lie. Get your facts together. Mal Moore even had a back up interview set in Miami expecting another "no" from Saban. Jeez people always think they are the smartest people until hit with actual truth.
-
buckeye2280 said...
The NCAA is not a court of law. The burden of proof of guilty beyond reasonable doubt doesn't exist. The NCAA can take everything the booster says as 100% truth if they so feel like it and slap any penalty they want on you. They have gone through courts before and courts have said that the NCAA is voluntary and by joining it you submit to its rules and standards. What can the former players sue for, especially if they refused to testify before the NCAA. There is no such thing as pleading the 5th before the NCAA rules committee. USC could sue and just might because the NCAA might have broken its own rules and regulations which is another matter, but as long as they follow their own rules and determine Miami is guilty, your stuck with any penalty they choose to give you.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by CFLACane on 12/6/2012 at 2:30 PM
-
CFLACane said...
You're right and since they aren't the court of law they open themselves up to defamation as i stated . The former players are not required to testify because they are past the statute of limitations and the NCAA has NO subpoena power. See the Todd Mcnair ruling just handed down by and California judge two weeks ago. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/27/sports/la-sp-newswire-20121128
You think the NCAA wants to fight a civil suit with a felon (shapiro) as their star witness? LMFAO ...what a PR nightmare .
All the evidence Shapiro and the NCAA were said to have had and they haven't made a decision in 18 months....obviously they have issues with validity.
If God dwells inside us, like some people say, I sure hope He likes enchiladas, because that's what He's getting
-
CFLACane said...
No pissing here...just trying to clear up common misconceptions. People are so quick to demonoize programs under investigation but 9/10 times the shotty investigations cause more damage to more kids than they were designed to protect. It's asinine and i wouldn't wish it on any school...unless Lane Kiffin is your coach.
-
CFLACane said...
You're right and since they aren't the court of law they open themselves up to defamation as i stated . The former players are not required to testify because they are past the statute of limitations and the NCAA has NO subpoena power. See the Todd Mcnair ruling just handed down by and California judge two weeks ago. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/27/sports/la-sp-newswire-20121128
You think the NCAA wants to fight a civil suit with a felon (shapiro) as their star witness? LMFAO ...what a PR nightmare .
All the evidence Shapiro and the NCAA were said to have had and they haven't made a decision in 18 months....obviously they have issues with validity.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by buckeye2280 on 12/6/2012 at 3:39 PM
buckeye2280 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 74
2701 votes total - (1642)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
ilovelamp51
- 5 stars Rating: 91
10142 votes total - Can't spell SWAG without the A.G.
- (19421)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BigEddySprings
- 5 stars Rating: 88
50 votes total - (123)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ilovelamp51
- 5 stars Rating: 91
10142 votes total - Can't spell SWAG without the A.G.
- (19421)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ilovelamp51
- 5 stars Rating: 91
10142 votes total - Can't spell SWAG without the A.G.
- (19421)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3

















Al Golden